Failure Analaysis

   Failure as a Design      Criterion

   Fracture Mechanics

 :: 

Tutorial Questions

 :: 

Griffith Equation


 :: 


Stress Intensity Factor and Fracture Toughness Testing
- Stresses Close to a Crack Tip
- Fracture of Glass
- High Strength Versus high Toughness
- Quenching and Residual Stress
- Missile Motor Case Fracture
- Fracture Toughness Tests
- Plastic Zone Effect
- Specimen Thickness Effect
- Growth of Semi-Elliptic Flaws
- Leak-Before-Break Concept
- Pressurised Vessels
- Fracture of a Beer Barrel
- Pin-Loaded Lug
- Materials Selection and Temperature
- Chemical Reactor Vessel
- Fracture of Ice


 :: 

Characterising Sub-Critical Growth
 -  Fatigue Life Prediction
 -  Stress Corrosion Cracking

 :: 

Theory Resource



Problem 4

This question illustrates the potential effect of quenching and residual stresses on fast fracture. It should take about 15 minutes to complete.

During water quenching of steel components with a section thickness of 30 mm, heat transfer calculations indicate that a peak stress of 130 MPa is generated in the section. Prior to heat treatment, the components were ultrasonically inspected to detect defects. The inspection technique has a minimum detection size of 0.5 mm.

a) What type of defect will be most critical?

b) Calculate the size of defect which would cause fracture of the component during the quenching operation, given that the aspect ratio of the crack is 2c/a = 10.

c) Would this inspection procedure guarantee integrity of the component if the quenching stresses approached the proof stress of the steel?

Note that the value of the plane strain fracture toughness K1C = 30 MPa m1/2 and the proof stress = 620 MPa. The stress intensity calibration for this component and crack geometry is given in the figure below.
Ksol.jpg (177284 bytes) Where, for surface flaws:

and for embedded flaws:


Scientific Calculator | RPN Calculator | Graph Plot | Theory


Hint | Solution

TOP

Failure Analysis  -  Fracture Mechanics  -  Failure As A Design Criterion