The Finite Difference Method
Finite Difference Approximation to Determine the Deflection of a Simply Supported Beam Subjected to a Uniformly Distributed Load, q N/m.
A beam (length L, second moment of area I, Young's modulus E) is
divided into 5 elements by 6 nodes (1 at each end and 4 equally spaced along the beam length).
The derivatives are approximated by using the differences of the nodal displacements yi as shown below.
As well as solving with Excel, these equations can also be solved using Matlab:
The two matrices can be input as follows:
As a specific example, the deflections of a steel beam for nodes 1 and 2 (0.2m and 0.4m from the left hand end - by symmetry the deflections at nodes 4 and 3 are the same) E = 210 GPa, 1 m long, 20 mm wide by 40 mm deep, (I = 106.67E-9 m4). with a uniformly distributed load of q = 100 N/m (so Ri = 20 N) were determined using the above equations and also modelled in Pro/Mechanica Structure FEA and later with Solid Works and analysed with COSMOSWorks FEA. The problem was also solved by substituting values in the equation for deflection derived from the analytical solution:
|Method of evaluation:||Finite differences||Pro/Mechanica FEA||COSMOSWorks FEA||Analytical|
|Deflection at node 1, mm||0.0357||0.0364||0.037||0.036|
|Deflection at node 2, mm||0.0571||0.0584||0.0583||0.0554|
It should be noted that E for steel in Pro/Mechanica is 209 GPa, 200GPa in COSMOSWorks, and 210 GPa was used in the other two methods. The results are in good agreement - the Pro/Mechanica solution involved 394 equations, whereas the FD approximation used only 4. Such a good results from a very simple FD model are only obtainable for a very simple configuration. Normally far more equations would be needed. The COSMOSWorks model contained over 5000 elements.
Return to module introduction
Return to Index of Online Documentation.
David J Grieve, updated 11th January 2007, original 30th April 2002.